Havas, Tim - Schick & Havas

★☆☆☆☆

About Havas, Tim - Schick & Havas

Hours
Mon. - Fri. 9am - 5pm;Sat. - Sun. CLOSED

Attorneys & Legal Services

Attorneys & Legal Services
More choices in Monticello:
Resultset_next

Pamplin Nina Power

478 Meadowview Dr Monticello, AR

Resultset_next

Daniels, William R William R Daniels PA

104 N Main St Monticello, AR

1.0 1
Hi! Sign in to let us know how Havas, Tim - Schick & Havas was?
Write a Review
.

Do not hire Steve Schick. As a legal aid attorney he was best buds with the prosecution. Tried to force plea deals. Do not hire this attorney. My husband has been in prison 18 years because of this man. He has been wrongfully imprisoned for murder in New York state since1992. But before unraveling the issues and facts, I ask you : Do you feel secure in your liberty and justice knowing that the following circumstances exist to deprive people of their freedom and lives ?
There was a trial, but the Legal Aid defense attorney who handles the case made no meaningful defensive investigation. Angry at my refusal to accept a plea deal for a crime I did not do, Legal Aid worked to prevent an effective defense.
Identification procedures were found by the court to have been " certainly suggestive" but allowed. Indications of misidentification at key points are indicated, but ignored. Over a dozen police reports, and accounts from at least four additional witnesses are being withheld by the prosecution. Also, crucial evidence such as the deceased's leather jacket, pants. underwear, boots and socks, as well as hospital x-rays, autopsy photos, weapons, and blood samples are absent or not being disclosed by the prosecution. These and other indications of evidence manipulation went unchallenged and ignored by Legal Aid.
The jury itself was unfair and biased. Prejudicial evidence suppressed by the court nevertheless reached the jury without the courts knowledge. On record, Legal Aid refused to inquire into objections to the unfair jury. On other occasions some jurors maintained their biased intent to view all evidence in favor of guilt.
Some declared their social connections to those prosecuting the case yet were never removed from acting as a jury member . Legal Aid refused to act upon any of this.
Taken together with other specifics of the case, the unreliable and unjust nature of this New York conviction should be apparent.

1
★☆☆☆☆

Do not hire Steve Schick. As a legal aid attorney he was best buds with the prosecution. Tried to force plea deals. Do not hire this attorney. My husband has been in prison 18 years because of this man. He has been wrongfully imprisoned for murder in New York state since1992. But before unraveling the issues and facts, I ask you : Do you feel secure in your liberty and justice knowing that the following circumstances exist to deprive people of their freedom and lives ?
There was a trial, but the Legal Aid defense attorney who handles the case made no meaningful defensive investigation. Angry at my refusal to accept a plea deal for a crime I did not do, Legal Aid worked to prevent an effective defense.
Identification procedures were found by the court to have been " certainly suggestive" but allowed. Indications of misidentification at key points are indicated, but ignored. Over a dozen police reports, and accounts from at least four additional witnesses are being withheld by the prosecution. Also, crucial evidence such as the deceased's leather jacket, pants. underwear, boots and socks, as well as hospital x-rays, autopsy photos, weapons, and blood samples are absent or not being disclosed by the prosecution. These and other indications of evidence manipulation went unchallenged and ignored by Legal Aid.
The jury itself was unfair and biased. Prejudicial evidence suppressed by the court nevertheless reached the jury without the courts knowledge. On record, Legal Aid refused to inquire into objections to the unfair jury. On other occasions some jurors maintained their biased intent to view all evidence in favor of guilt.
Some declared their social connections to those prosecuting the case yet were never removed from acting as a jury member . Legal Aid refused to act upon any of this.
Taken together with other specifics of the case, the unreliable and unjust nature of this New York conviction should be apparent.

Was this review helpful to you?
Ratings_icons Ratings_icons

 

Wait, you're the expert.

If you've been to or used Havas, Tim - Schick & Havas, leave a review.

It's easy, only takes a couple of minutes and you'll help thousands make an informed decision.



Write a Review