Bankruptcy Attorney Relief Team

★☆☆☆☆
  • 32411 Mound Road

    Warren, MI 48092

    Map & Directions
  • 586-303-2211

About Bankruptcy Attorney Relief Team

Categories
  • Bankruptcy Lawyers

Attorneys & Legal Services

Attorneys & Legal Services
More choices in Warren:
Resultset_next

Ardelean & Dunne Pllc

24300 Southfield Road, Suite 308 Southfield, MA

Resultset_next

William R Orlow & Assoc Inc

24100 Woodward Ave # B Pleasant Ridge, MI

1.0 1
Hi! Sign in to let us know how Bankruptcy Attorney Relief Team was?
Write a Review
.

At a public hearing conducted on February 7, 2001, the parties appeared before the panel and placed a Stipulation for Consent Order of Discipline on the record. The parties advised that the stipulation was subject to approval by the Attorney Grievance Commission under the procedure described in MCR 9.115(F)(5). The panel has reviewed the testimony of Respondent Christopher Aiello and finds that the stipulation was entered into freely and voluntarily. The panel further concludes that the terms of the stipulation are reasonable and are consistent with the goals of these discipline proceedings. Respondent pled no contest to the allegations of professional misconduct contained in Count Two, sub-paragraph 21(a) of Formal Complaint 00-40-GA, specifically: That respondent prepared, drafted, and filed objections to the Friend of the Court recommendations and supplemental brief although he was terminated as counsel and without the consent of his client. Respondent=s conduct was in violation of MCR 8.121(A)-(C); 9.104(1)-(4); and Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct 1.4(b); 1.16(d); and 8.4(a) and (c). The parties agreed that an order of reprimand should be entered.
The hearing panel ordered that respondent be reprimanded and assessed

1
★☆☆☆☆

At a public hearing conducted on February 7, 2001, the parties appeared before the panel and placed a Stipulation for Consent Order of Discipline on the record. The parties advised that the stipulation was subject to approval by the Attorney Grievance Commission under the procedure described in MCR 9.115(F)(5). The panel has reviewed the testimony of Respondent Christopher Aiello and finds that the stipulation was entered into freely and voluntarily. The panel further concludes that the terms of the stipulation are reasonable and are consistent with the goals of these discipline proceedings. Respondent pled no contest to the allegations of professional misconduct contained in Count Two, sub-paragraph 21(a) of Formal Complaint 00-40-GA, specifically: That respondent prepared, drafted, and filed objections to the Friend of the Court recommendations and supplemental brief although he was terminated as counsel and without the consent of his client. Respondent=s conduct was in violation of MCR 8.121(A)-(C); 9.104(1)-(4); and Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct 1.4(b); 1.16(d); and 8.4(a) and (c). The parties agreed that an order of reprimand should be entered.
The hearing panel ordered that respondent be reprimanded and assessed

Was this review helpful to you?
Ratings_icons Ratings_icons

 

Wait, you're the expert.

If you've been to or used Bankruptcy Attorney Relief Team, leave a review.

It's easy, only takes a couple of minutes and you'll help thousands make an informed decision.



Write a Review